High Performance Is Subjective
Most performance frameworks guarantee failure during the moments that matter most.
There’s a definition of high performance that most people carry around without ever questioning it. It sounds something like this: wake up at 5am, hit the gym, execute the morning routine, clear the inbox, crush the to-do list. Performance as a set of objective standards applied uniformly across every day, regardless of context.
The trouble with this version is that it works brilliantly right up until it doesn’t. And the moments where it stops working, illness, exhaustion, life falling apart in small or large ways, are precisely the moments where a useful definition of performance would matter most.
I’ve been very much enjoying a different definition for a while now. High performance, defined subjectively: doing the best you can, with what you have, at any given time. That’s it. No absolute standard. No comparison to yesterday or to someone else’s output. Just an honest assessment of what’s available right now, and whether it’s being used well.
The objective trap
The standard model of performance is seductive because it’s measurable. Five gym sessions a week. Eight hours of deep work. A streak of 30 consecutive days. Numbers give the illusion of control, and control feels like progress.
But measurement creates a binary: you either hit the target or you didn’t. And the moment you miss, the entire framework turns against you. A missed gym session becomes evidence of failure. A low-energy day becomes a broken streak. The system that was supposed to drive performance now generates guilt, and guilt is one of the least productive emotions available.
The deeper problem is what happens during inevitable low periods. Everyone gets ill. Everyone has periods where sleep is broken, energy is depleted, circumstances shift. An objective framework has nothing useful to say about these periods except “you’re falling behind.” Which is completely unhelpful.
Subjective performance as a practice
The subjective reframe changes the question entirely. Instead of “did I hit my target?” the question becomes “given what I actually have available today, am I using it?”
On a good day, that might mean a full training session and four hours of focused work. On a day where man-flu has stripped capacity down to 30%, it might mean a 15-minute walk and one meaningful task. Both can qualify as high performance, because the benchmark adjusts to reality rather than ignoring it.
The standards remain high. They just become responsive to actual conditions. A pilot doesn’t fly the same approach in clear skies and heavy fog. The skill is in adjusting to what’s real, not in pretending conditions don’t exist.
People who operate from an objective framework tend to have two modes: performing and failing. There’s no middle ground, and it’s brutal on the self. The subjective frame introduces a third option: adapting. And adaptation, over long enough timescales, compounds into something far more durable than any streak.
Remove the conditions for failure first
This is where it gets practical, and where most advice gets the sequence backwards.
The default approach to improving performance is additive: add a meditation practice, add a workout routine, add a journaling habit, add a morning routine. Stack enough positive behaviours and eventually the compound effect kicks in.
The problem is that adding behaviours to an already strained system increases the number of things that can go wrong. Every new habit is a new opportunity to fail. And when someone is already in a low period, adding more is almost guaranteed to produce more failure and more experience of defeat, not more progress.
The better sequence is subtractive. Before adding anything, identify and remove the contexts where failure is most likely. If social obligations reliably drain energy and create stress, reduce them. If an ambitious gym schedule generates more missed sessions than completed ones, strip it back. If the current daily structure contains three or four things that regularly don’t get done, stop pretending they will.
This feels like giving up. In practice, it builds a foundation that can hold weight.
Achievable daily wins
What replaces the removed items matters. The goal is a small set of daily activities so achievable they’re almost impossible to fail at. A walk. Five minutes of stretching. One focused task. These aren’t impressive. That’s the point.
The function of achievable daily wins isn’t the activity itself. It’s the feeling of consistency, control, and agency that comes from completing them. Day after day, the experience shifts from “I keep failing at my ambitious plan” to “I keep showing up for my realistic one.” Confidence builds from that foundation, not from the ambition of the plan.
Consistency over intensity. I keep returning to this because the evidence for it is everywhere. The people who sustain performance over years aren’t the ones who had the most intense periods. They’re the ones who found a baseline they could maintain through the low points and built upward from there.
The intense periods come and go. The baseline remains. And the baseline is what determines the long-term trajectory.
The long view
None of this produces dramatic short-term results. That’s partially why it’s undervalued. The culture around performance favours visible intensity: the before-and-after transformation, the 30-day challenge, the dramatic overhaul. Quiet consistency doesn’t photograph well.
But over three months, six months, a year, the person who maintained a sustainable baseline through every dip and disruption is further along than the person who sprinted and crashed repeatedly. The maths is simple, even if the daily experience of it feels underwhelming.
The sequence matters: define performance subjectively, remove the conditions where failure is most likely, build from wins so small they’re almost impossible to miss, and let consistency do the compounding.
This applies to everything: health, entrepreneurship, relationships, investing - you name it. The ambitious plan can come later. First, build something that doesn’t break, and neither will you.
If this piece added something to your week, please consider subscribing :)